O
Stockton
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock contract (12.17)

Stockton

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (6)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 31, 2026.

Public comments (6)

OpposedUnidentified Resident (Laura Connor)Mar 31, 2026

Spoke against the Flock amendment, saying the surveillance system is already too extensive, the $3.15M should fund housing and jobs instead, and Flock's ICE data-sharing endangers immigrant neighbors.

Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 59:18 →
OpposedAdria VidalesMar 31, 2026

Urged a no vote on the Flock funding increase, saying the system is used to target immigrants and protesters and the money should go to housing and schools instead.

Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:01:12 →
OpposedGarrett DaniellsMar 31, 2026

Cited an Oak Park, Illinois case study with a 40% error rate in Flock-related traffic stops, and warned Flock data has been used by abortion-ban states to track women crossing state lines.

Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:10:01 →
OpposedTanner HeardMar 31, 2026

Said $3.15 million equals what a worker earning $50,000 would make over 63 years, and urged the council to spend it on lifeguards, SEIU members, and community needs instead of unproven AI surveillance.

Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:13:35 →
OpposedJnessa FrancoMar 31, 2026

Opposed the drone contract on algorithmic bias grounds, citing ACLU criticism, redundant police drone inventory, and Stockton's 7% unemployment rate.

Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:15:30 →
OpposedJarred WrightMar 31, 2026

Asked whether the council puts money or immigrants first, saying the city cannot claim to be safe for immigrant communities while contracting with a company that shares data with ICE.

Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:20:00 →