Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 31, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Spoke against the Flock amendment, saying the surveillance system is already too extensive, the $3.15M should fund housing and jobs instead, and Flock's ICE data-sharing endangers immigrant neighbors.
Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 59:18 →Urged a no vote on the Flock funding increase, saying the system is used to target immigrants and protesters and the money should go to housing and schools instead.
Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:01:12 →Cited an Oak Park, Illinois case study with a 40% error rate in Flock-related traffic stops, and warned Flock data has been used by abortion-ban states to track women crossing state lines.
Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:10:01 →Said $3.15 million equals what a worker earning $50,000 would make over 63 years, and urged the council to spend it on lifeguards, SEIU members, and community needs instead of unproven AI surveillance.
Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:13:35 →Opposed the drone contract on algorithmic bias grounds, citing ACLU criticism, redundant police drone inventory, and Stockton's 7% unemployment rate.
Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:15:30 →Asked whether the council puts money or immigrants first, saying the city cannot claim to be safe for immigrant communities while contracting with a company that shares data with ICE.
Regular Meeting - Mar 31, 2026 · 1:20:00 →