O
Stockton
← Community
EnvironmentCommunity discussion

Solid waste franchises

Stockton

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (3)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 9, 2026.

Public comments (6)

OpposedTom BruenJun 9, 2026

Attorney for Sunrise Sanitation argued a third commercial hauler would destroy the rate structure that subsidizes residential rates.

Regular Meeting - Jun 9, 2026 · 1:15:00 →
SupportiveKevin BassoJun 9, 2026

CalWaste representative argued the commercial franchise is non-exclusive and competition improves service for all.

Regular Meeting - Jun 9, 2026 · 1:19:58 →
SupportiveNicole SidnerJun 9, 2026

Property manager supporting a third hauler, saying competition drives accountability and customer service.

Regular Meeting - Jun 9, 2026 · 1:22:14 →
SupportiveDave VaccarezzaJun 9, 2026

CalWaste owner described the company's century of local service and investment, asking for the chance to compete.

Regular Meeting - Jun 9, 2026 · 1:24:31 →
OpposedSteve HerunJun 9, 2026

Waste Management's attorney argued the contract grants co-exclusive commercial rights and warned allowing competition could raise residential rates.

Regular Meeting - Jun 9, 2026 · 1:26:31 →
OpposedEmily HansonJun 9, 2026

Republic Services representative warned of breach-of-contract risk and the need to make incumbents whole, noting contracts run to 2029.

Regular Meeting - Jun 9, 2026 · 1:44:22 →